Conditional Reasoning with Subjective Logic
نویسنده
چکیده
Conditional inference plays a central role in logical and Bayesian reasoning, and is used in a wide range of applications. It basically consists of expressing conditional relationship between parent and child propositions, and then to combine those conditionals with evidence about the parent propositions in order to infer conclusions about the child propositions. While conditional reasoning is a well established part of classical binary logic and probability calculus, its extension to belief theory has only recently been proposed. Subjective opinions represent a special type of general belief functions. This article focuses on conditional reasoning in subjective logic where beliefs are represented in the form of binomial or multinomial subjective opinions. Binomial conditional reasoning operators for subjective logic have been defined in previous contributions. We extend this approach to multinomial opinions, thereby making it possible to represent conditional and evidence opinions on frames of arbitrary size. This makes subjective logic a powerful tool for conditional reasoning in situations involving ignorance and partial information, and makes it possible to analyse Bayesian network models with uncertain probabilities.
منابع مشابه
Inverting Conditional Opinions in Subjective Logic
Subjective Logic has operators for conditional deduction and conditional abduction where subjective opinions are input arguments. With these operators traditional Bayesian reasoning can be generalised from taking only probabilistic arguments to also taking opinions as arguments, thereby allowing Bayesian modeling of situations affected by uncertainty and incomplete information. Conditional dedu...
متن کاملOn probabilistic inference in relational conditional logics
The principle of maximum entropy has proven to be a powerful approach for commonsense reasoning in probabilistic conditional logics on propositional languages. Due to this principle, reasoning is performed based on the unique model of a knowledge base that has maximum entropy. This kind of model-based inference fulfills many desirable properties for inductive inference mechanisms and is usually...
متن کاملReasoning from Causal and Noncausal Conditionals: Testing an Integrated Framework
We suggest and test an integrated framework explaining how the interpretation of and the reasoning from causal conditionals (e.g., "If you fertilize a flower it will bloom") depend on exceptions. In the model availability of exceptional situations (e.g., "the flower was not watered enough") reduces the subjective conditional probability of the consequent given the antecedent, P(q p). The condit...
متن کاملComprehension of factual, nonfactual, and counterfactual conditionals by Iranian EFL learners
A considerable amount of studies have been established on conditional reasoning supporting mental model theory of propositional reasoning. Mental model theory proposed by Johnson- larid and Byrne is an explanation of someone's thought process about how something occurs in the real world. Conditional reasoning as a kind of reasoning is the way to speak about possibilities or probabilities. The a...
متن کاملNew normative standards of conditional reasoning and the dual-source model
There has been a major shift in research on human reasoning toward Bayesian and probabilistic approaches, which has been called a new paradigm. The new paradigm sees most everyday and scientific reasoning as taking place in a context of uncertainty, and inference is from uncertain beliefs and not from arbitrary assumptions. In this manuscript we present an empirical test of normative standards ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing
دوره 15 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009